💳 American Express Q2 2025: Still Premium, But Fairly Valued?

American Express (AXP) Q2 2025 earnings analysis: record revenue, 3.1M new cards, and strong fee growth offset by rising costs. SWOT analysis, valuation scenarios, and price outlook for value investors.

TL;DR Summary

American Express (AXP) posted record revenue and beat EPS expectations, yet shares dipped slightly as investors digested rising costs and macro risk. Despite strong cardholder engagement and new card growth, the current valuation leaves little margin of safety. AXP looks like a “Hold” — with better buying potential under $290.


Q2 2025 Recap: Resilient Premium Growth, Margin Watch

AXP reported $17.9B in revenue (+9% YoY) and EPS of $4.08, beating consensus estimates. Spending in premium categories stayed strong, with +10% in business-class travel and +9% in luxury lodging. The company added 3.1 million new cards, a majority in fee-paying tiers.

Despite strong revenue, expenses grew 14% YoY, primarily due to investments in the Platinum platform, Centurion Lounge expansion, and digital infrastructure. Management reaffirmed full-year guidance and expressed confidence in monetizing these investments starting Q4.


Key Highlights

  • Record revenue: $17.9B (+9% YoY)
  • EPS: $4.08 (vs. $3.87 est.)
  • Fee revenue: +20% YoY
  • Luxury spend: +10% (biz class), +9% (lodging > $5K)
  • New cards: 3.1M (majority fee-based)
  • Expenses: +14% YoY
  • Guidance reaffirmed: EPS $15.0–15.5 for FY25

📈 Revenue vs Net Income (Past 5 Quarters)

Line chart showing American Express revenue and net income trends over the past five quarters from Q2 2024 to Q2 2025

SWOT Analysis

In Q2 2025, American Express showed strong fundamentals with growing revenue and customer engagement, but rising expenses and macro uncertainty created a more balanced risk-reward profile.

Strengths

  • Consistent top-line growth
  • Strong brand and pricing power
  • EPS beat and stable credit metrics
  • High-spend user base remains sticky
    → Impact: +$10 to +$15

Weaknesses

  • Operating costs growing faster than revenue
  • Near-term margin pressure
    → Impact: –$5 to –$10

Opportunities

  • Upside from monetizing Platinum & lounges
  • Rising NII and strong card acquisition
    → Impact: +$8 to +$12

Threats

  • Valuation premium (~21× P/E)
  • Macro risk: spending could slow
    → Impact: –$10 to –$15
SWOT table summarizing price impact estimates for American Express Q2 2025 including Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats

📊 SWOT Price Impact Chart

Bar chart showing estimated price impacts of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for American Express

Valuation Scenarios

To gauge where American Express stock could head next, we modeled three valuation scenarios based on management’s full-year EPS guidance and current market conditions. These scenarios—bull, base, and bear—reflect different assumptions about earnings performance and valuation multiples. By assigning probabilities to each case, we arrive at a fair value estimate to help long-term investors assess risk and reward more objectively.

Valuation scenarios table showing bull, base, and bear cases for American Express Q2 2025 with price targets and EPS assumptions

🎯 Fair Value = $307 (probability-weighted)

Visual 3: 📐 Valuation Scenario Chart

Vertical bar chart comparing bull, base, bear valuation targets and current price of AXP

Peer Comparison: How Does AXP Stack Up?

Before deciding whether to hold or accumulate more shares, it’s helpful to see how American Express stacks up against similar financial giants. While AXP excels in card fee growth and premium customer acquisition, competitors like Visaand Capital One offer different strengths—whether it’s higher scale or better short-term valuation. Here’s a snapshot comparing key financial metrics from Q2 2025 across the three companies:

Table comparing American Express to Visa and Capital One on EPS growth, revenue growth, operating expenses, dividend yield, and forward P/E ratio in Q2 2025

Verdict: Hold For Now — But Watch That $290 Line

American Express is still executing at a high level, but the stock looks fully priced for now. With fair value near $307, the market isn’t offering a discount. For long-term investors, a dip to the $280–290 range could create a more attractive setup.

📌 Current View: Hold
📉 Buy Zone: Under $290
📈 Re-evaluate: Over $325


Call to Action

Enjoying SWOTstock’s clean, earnings-driven breakdowns?
Follow us for investor-focused insights on earnings season.
No hype. Just data, discipline, and decisions that work.


Disclaimer

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All data is sourced from American Express’s official Q2 2025 earnings release and call transcript.


Leave a comment


JPMorgan vs. Citigroup: How Q1 Set the Tone for a Pivotal Q2 2025

Featured image displaying JPMorgan and Citi logos side by side on a blue background with “vs.” between them, representing a comparison of their Q1 2025 earnings performance.

TL;DR:
JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) kicked off 2025 with strong Q1 earnings, bolstered by solid trading performance and robust net interest income. But as Q2 earnings approach, both banks face persistent macroeconomic uncertainty, cautious client sentiment, and a potentially slower investment banking environment. Here’s how Q1 played out—and what investors should be watching this July.


Q1 Recap: Momentum With a Hint of Caution

U.S. megabanks are heading into Q2 earnings season on the back of a strong start to 2025. JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup delivered better-than-expected first-quarter results, supported by healthy interest income, strong trading activity, and improved cost discipline. Yet, under the surface, both management teams signaled caution—highlighting inflation, geopolitical risk, and client conservatism as emerging themes.

Let’s break down how each bank performed and what might lie ahead.


JPMorgan: Trading Desk Strength and Rate Tailwinds

JPMorgan reported Q1 net revenue of $46 billion, up 8% year-over-year, and net income of $14.6 billion, with earnings per share at $5.07, beating expectations. The strength came from two key engines:

  • Net interest income, which jumped to $23.4 billion thanks to favorable rate conditions and sustained loan growth.
  • Trading revenues, which surged 21% to $9.7 billion—fueled by a 48% jump in equities trading, a record quarter for that unit.

Investment banking fees rose 12%, signaling resilience in select M&A and debt market deals. However, credit provisions increased to $3.3 billion, suggesting a more conservative stance heading into a potentially rockier second half.

CEO Jamie Dimon struck a familiar note of pragmatism, warning about “considerable turbulence” from inflation, fiscal deficits, and geopolitical instability—even as those same forces have benefited JPM’s market-facing businesses.

Q2 Watchlist for JPM:

  • Can trading continue to outperform amid summer market activity?
  • Will loan growth in consumer and commercial lending remain resilient?
  • Are credit provisions hinting at broader credit concerns?

Citigroup: Cost Discipline and Trading Surprise

Citigroup also posted a solid Q1, with net income of $4.1 billion, up 21% from a year ago, and revenue of $21.6 billion. Earnings per share came in at $1.96, topping consensus. What stood out was the mix of trading performance and improved cost controls.

  • Markets revenue rose 12%, with equities trading jumping 23%.
  • Operating expenses declined 5%, aided by lower FDIC assessments and progress on Citi’s restructuring efforts.
  • RoTCE reached 9.1%, and the bank’s CET1 capital ratio stood at a strong 13.4%.

Still, Citi added $2.7 billion in credit provisions, increasing total reserves to $22.8 billion—a sign that management is not letting its guard down. CEO Jane Fraser struck a constructive tone, citing the U.S. economy’s relative resilience but emphasizing the need to remain cautious amid global uncertainty.

Q2 Watchlist for Citi:

  • Are cost control and digital investments delivering lasting operating leverage?
  • Will interest margins hold up if rates remain steady?
  • Can investment banking recover in a choppy macro environment?

JPMorgan vs. Citi: Diverging Strengths, Common Risks

While both banks had strong first quarters, they are navigating Q2 with different levers of strength.

Table comparing JPMorgan and Citigroup Q1 2025 performance across trading revenue, cost discipline, investment banking activity, and risk management. Highlights JPMorgan’s strength in equities trading and diversified earnings versus Citigroup’s progress in cost control and capital efficiency.

JPMorgan’s scale and diversified earnings base give it an edge in uncertain times, while Citigroup is gaining ground through cost cuts and capital efficiency. But both are facing the same headwinds: tighter client budgets, regulatory pressure, and slowing deal activity.


What to Expect in Q2 2025

Q2 earnings will likely test whether Q1 momentum is sustainable. Trading may stay strong if market volatility persists, but credit costs and weak investment banking pipelines could put pressure on profits.

Key themes to monitor:

  • Credit quality: Are rising reserves signaling trouble ahead?
  • Capital deployment: Will management remain cautious with buybacks and dividends?
  • Tech and efficiency: Are digital investments translating into real operating leverage?

Don’t overlook the earnings call commentary from Jamie Dimon and Jane Fraser—their tone will offer key signals about how megabanks view the second half of the year.


Verdict

JPMorgan remains the more defensive play, with a proven trading engine and diversified model. Citigroup is a potential turnaround story, showing credible progress on efficiency. Both face macro uncertainty, but also opportunity—especially if rate conditions stay supportive and markets remain active.

Retail investors should stay focused on margin resilience, capital trends, and credit provisioning as the next round of earnings unfolds.


Follow SWOTstock for JPMorgan and Citigroup Q2 earnings detail SWOT analysis and valuation scenarios.


Leave a comment