💼 Wells Fargo Q2 2025: A Clearer Runway—But Is the Price Still Right?

Wells Fargo Q2 2025 earnings beat expectations, but NII guidance disappointed. Is the stock undervalued or overhyped? SWOT analysis for value investors.

TL;DR – Strong Quarter, Valuation Getting Ahead?

Wells Fargo delivered solid earnings and regulatory clarity in Q2 2025, including the long-awaited removal of its Fed-imposed asset cap. But flat guidance for Net Interest Income (NII) spooked the market. While shares are rebounding, value investors may want to wait for a more attractive margin of safety closer to $76 before entering.


📊 Quarter Recap: Asset Cap Lifted, But NII Dampens Mood

Wells Fargo posted $5.49B in net income (+12% YoY) and $1.60 EPS, beating expectations. Revenue reached $20.82B, with non-interest income showing strength in advisory and trading fees.

However, Net Interest Income (NII) declined 2% YoY, and full-year guidance was trimmed from growth to flat. That change triggered a 5.6% selloff, before shares rebounded.

CEO Charlie Scharf called the quarter a turning point:

“The lifting of the asset cap by the Federal Reserve marked a pivotal milestone in our transformation.”

Wells is now repositioning for growth—especially in fee-based businesses.


🔍 Key Highlights from Q2

  • Net Income rose to $5.49B, with EPS at $1.60 (GAAP)
  • NII dropped 2% YoY; FY guidance trimmed to flat growth
  • Non-interest income strengthened, especially investment banking (+9%)
  • Efficiency focus continues with tight expense control
  • Asset cap lifted, removing key regulatory hurdle
  • Capital return likely to increase—dividend hikes expected post stress test
Line chart showing Wells Fargo’s revenue and net income over the past five quarters from Q2 2024 to Q2 2025.

🏦 Peer Context: Wells vs JPMorgan & Citi

  • Wells Fargo: Guided for flat NII in FY2025
  • Citigroup: Reiterated low single-digit growth
  • JPMorgan: Holding NII flat, with cost controls as offset

Wells appears slightly more conservative than peers, raising questions about credit demand and pricing pressure.


💵 Capital Return Outlook: What’s Coming?

Wells Fargo currently yields 1.73%, but management has hinted at capital returns improving post-stress test.

  • 10–12% dividend hike is feasible, which would push the yield toward 1.9–2.0%.
  • Share repurchases are also likely to resume more meaningfully in H2 2025.

This return to “normal” capital policy is a key pillar for value-focused investors.


🧭 SWOT Analysis

Wells Fargo’s Q2 2025 performance marks a strategic inflection point—regulatory shackles are gone, fee-based income is recovering, and capital returns are back on the table. But macro uncertainty and cautious NII guidance leave questions about short-term upside. The SWOT analysis below breaks down the bank’s positioning, including estimated price impact for each factor to help value investors frame risk and reward.

SWOT analysis table for Wells Fargo Q2 2025 showing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with estimated stock price impact ranges.
Updated SWOT price impact bar chart for Wells Fargo Q2 2025 with symmetric spacing and x-axis starting at –8, illustrating the estimated stock price effect of each SWOT factor.

📈 Valuation Scenarios

After evaluating Wells Fargo’s Q2 2025 results, it’s clear that the market has reacted positively to the lifting of the asset cap and stronger capital positioning. However, to determine whether the current share price reflects true value, we turn to the fundamentals. By applying a blended model—based on earnings, book value, and dividend yield—we arrive at a fair value that gives value investors a grounded view of what the stock is really worth.

Valuation scenarios table for Wells Fargo Q2 2025, including bull, base, and bear case target prices with probability weights and risk-adjusted fair value estimate.

🎯 Probability-Weighted Price Target: $82.30

Vertical bar chart showing Wells Fargo’s Q2 2025 valuation scenarios with target prices for Bear, Base, Bull cases and current stock price, including a dotted line marking the fair value estimate at $82.30.

🧮 Fair Value Estimate: Clarity Through the Numbers

We calculate fair value using three methods based on official Q2 2025 data:

Fair value breakdown table for Wells Fargo Q2 2025 using earnings-based, book value, and dividend yield models, showing individual estimates and the blended fair value of $75.94.

🔎 Verdict: Watchlist Candidate, Not Yet a Buy

With the stock currently at $80.64 and our fair value at $75.94, Wells Fargo is trading 5.8% above our estimate.
While long-term upside exists, value investors may want to wait for a pullback toward $74–76 to lock in a proper margin of safety. The market has largely priced in the asset cap news—but not yet the risk of stagnating interest income.


📣 Call to Action

Want to see how Wells Fargo stacks up against JPMorgan and Citi? Check out our recent bank earnings breakdowns and subscribe for alerts on Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley in the days ahead.


🛑 Disclaimer

This blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not investment advice. All analysis is based solely on official company filings and earnings calls.


Leave a comment


JPMorgan vs. Citigroup: How Q1 Set the Tone for a Pivotal Q2 2025

Featured image displaying JPMorgan and Citi logos side by side on a blue background with “vs.” between them, representing a comparison of their Q1 2025 earnings performance.

TL;DR:
JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) kicked off 2025 with strong Q1 earnings, bolstered by solid trading performance and robust net interest income. But as Q2 earnings approach, both banks face persistent macroeconomic uncertainty, cautious client sentiment, and a potentially slower investment banking environment. Here’s how Q1 played out—and what investors should be watching this July.


Q1 Recap: Momentum With a Hint of Caution

U.S. megabanks are heading into Q2 earnings season on the back of a strong start to 2025. JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup delivered better-than-expected first-quarter results, supported by healthy interest income, strong trading activity, and improved cost discipline. Yet, under the surface, both management teams signaled caution—highlighting inflation, geopolitical risk, and client conservatism as emerging themes.

Let’s break down how each bank performed and what might lie ahead.


JPMorgan: Trading Desk Strength and Rate Tailwinds

JPMorgan reported Q1 net revenue of $46 billion, up 8% year-over-year, and net income of $14.6 billion, with earnings per share at $5.07, beating expectations. The strength came from two key engines:

  • Net interest income, which jumped to $23.4 billion thanks to favorable rate conditions and sustained loan growth.
  • Trading revenues, which surged 21% to $9.7 billion—fueled by a 48% jump in equities trading, a record quarter for that unit.

Investment banking fees rose 12%, signaling resilience in select M&A and debt market deals. However, credit provisions increased to $3.3 billion, suggesting a more conservative stance heading into a potentially rockier second half.

CEO Jamie Dimon struck a familiar note of pragmatism, warning about “considerable turbulence” from inflation, fiscal deficits, and geopolitical instability—even as those same forces have benefited JPM’s market-facing businesses.

Q2 Watchlist for JPM:

  • Can trading continue to outperform amid summer market activity?
  • Will loan growth in consumer and commercial lending remain resilient?
  • Are credit provisions hinting at broader credit concerns?

Citigroup: Cost Discipline and Trading Surprise

Citigroup also posted a solid Q1, with net income of $4.1 billion, up 21% from a year ago, and revenue of $21.6 billion. Earnings per share came in at $1.96, topping consensus. What stood out was the mix of trading performance and improved cost controls.

  • Markets revenue rose 12%, with equities trading jumping 23%.
  • Operating expenses declined 5%, aided by lower FDIC assessments and progress on Citi’s restructuring efforts.
  • RoTCE reached 9.1%, and the bank’s CET1 capital ratio stood at a strong 13.4%.

Still, Citi added $2.7 billion in credit provisions, increasing total reserves to $22.8 billion—a sign that management is not letting its guard down. CEO Jane Fraser struck a constructive tone, citing the U.S. economy’s relative resilience but emphasizing the need to remain cautious amid global uncertainty.

Q2 Watchlist for Citi:

  • Are cost control and digital investments delivering lasting operating leverage?
  • Will interest margins hold up if rates remain steady?
  • Can investment banking recover in a choppy macro environment?

JPMorgan vs. Citi: Diverging Strengths, Common Risks

While both banks had strong first quarters, they are navigating Q2 with different levers of strength.

Table comparing JPMorgan and Citigroup Q1 2025 performance across trading revenue, cost discipline, investment banking activity, and risk management. Highlights JPMorgan’s strength in equities trading and diversified earnings versus Citigroup’s progress in cost control and capital efficiency.

JPMorgan’s scale and diversified earnings base give it an edge in uncertain times, while Citigroup is gaining ground through cost cuts and capital efficiency. But both are facing the same headwinds: tighter client budgets, regulatory pressure, and slowing deal activity.


What to Expect in Q2 2025

Q2 earnings will likely test whether Q1 momentum is sustainable. Trading may stay strong if market volatility persists, but credit costs and weak investment banking pipelines could put pressure on profits.

Key themes to monitor:

  • Credit quality: Are rising reserves signaling trouble ahead?
  • Capital deployment: Will management remain cautious with buybacks and dividends?
  • Tech and efficiency: Are digital investments translating into real operating leverage?

Don’t overlook the earnings call commentary from Jamie Dimon and Jane Fraser—their tone will offer key signals about how megabanks view the second half of the year.


Verdict

JPMorgan remains the more defensive play, with a proven trading engine and diversified model. Citigroup is a potential turnaround story, showing credible progress on efficiency. Both face macro uncertainty, but also opportunity—especially if rate conditions stay supportive and markets remain active.

Retail investors should stay focused on margin resilience, capital trends, and credit provisioning as the next round of earnings unfolds.


Follow SWOTstock for JPMorgan and Citigroup Q2 earnings detail SWOT analysis and valuation scenarios.


Leave a comment